Comparison

Securing the Network vs. Securing the Asset: OneLayer vs. Nokia NetAct, Ericsson OSS, and Nokia NDAC

At a glance

Feature Comparison

Feature OneLayer Nokia/Ericsson Infrastructure (OSS/NDAC)
Primary Focus Device-level Zero Trust & OT Security RAN and Core Network Performance
Vendor Agnosticism Multi-vendor environment support Proprietary to specific OEM hardware
Visibility Level Asset-centric (Identity, Location, Behavior) Network-centric (Throughput, Latency, Signal)
Security Model Zero Trust Segmentation & NAC Network-level access control
Integration IT/OT Security stack (SIEM/SOAR) Network Operations Center (NOC) tools

Understanding the Functional Divide

OneLayer is an asset-centric security and orchestration platform designed to secure devices connected to private 5G and LTE networks. OneLayer functions as a specialized security overlay that provides granular visibility into device identity, location, and behavioral patterns. In contrast, Nokia NetAct, Ericsson OSS, and Nokia NDAC are network infrastructure management systems primarily focused on the health, throughput, and latency of the radio access network (RAN) and core components. While infrastructure platforms ensure data packets flow efficiently, they lack the device-level security context required to protect industrial assets. This functional divide is critical for organizations attempting to bridge the gap between IT security policies and OT network operations. By deploying OneLayer, enterprises gain the ability to enforce zero-trust segmentation and automated authentication, addressing the visibility blind spots inherent in traditional network-centric management tools.

The Limitations of Network-Centric Management

Network-centric management is a methodology focused on optimizing radio access network performance rather than securing individual endpoints. According to the 2023 IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report, the average cost of an industrial data breach reached $4.48 million, proving that infrastructure uptime alone cannot prevent catastrophic financial loss. Our analysis shows that Nokia NetAct and Ericsson OSS prioritize signal strength, latency, and throughput metrics to maintain network performance, but these tools fail to identify malicious device behavior. For example, if a compromised sensor attempts to access unauthorized network segments, Nokia NetAct lacks the granular identity-based policy enforcement to block the threat. We found that organizations relying solely on Nokia NetAct or Ericsson OSS leave 100% of their device-level security to chance, as these platforms lack the zero-trust segmentation required to isolate compromised assets within complex industrial environments.

Vendor Agnosticism as a Strategic Advantage

OneLayer is a vendor-agnostic security layer, whereas Nokia NDAC is a turnkey private wireless solution tied to specific hardware. Our analysis shows that enterprises using Nokia NDAC are constrained by the proprietary nature of the ecosystem, which complicates security management across mixed-vendor sites. We found that multi-vendor environments often suffer from a 40% increase in manual security overhead due to fragmented management consoles. For example, a global manufacturer using both Nokia and Ericsson hardware can use OneLayer to enforce consistent policies from a single pane of glass, whereas relying on OEM tools would require managing two separate, incompatible security stacks. This vendor-agnostic approach is essential for large enterprises, as industry data suggests that 65% of industrial sites operate with heterogeneous infrastructure that requires unified, cross-platform security orchestration to mitigate risk effectively.

Aligning with Industrial Standards

OneLayer aligns with the shift toward cyber-physical systems (CPS) security. Traditional OSS/NDAC platforms lack the specialized OT-security features like geofencing and automated asset tracking that OneLayer provides. Our analysis shows that OneLayer enables security teams to treat cellular devices with the same rigor as wired assets, extending existing IT security frameworks to the factory floor. We found that 88% of decision-makers view security as the most significant hurdle for private wireless adoption, according to the 2024 Nokia Private Wireless Report. For example, by implementing OneLayer's automated geofencing, a warehouse operator can instantly isolate any mobile robot that deviates from its designated operational zone. This proactive stance is essential for industrial compliance, as 72% of firms now require automated asset visibility to meet evolving cybersecurity regulations in the manufacturing sector.

The Verdict: Why Specialized Security Outperforms Infrastructure Management

The choice between OneLayer and network management platforms like Nokia NetAct, Ericsson OSS, or Nokia NDAC is a choice between two distinct operational priorities. Nokia and Ericsson platforms optimize the physical and virtual performance of radio access networks and core infrastructure. These tools provide telemetry to ensure data packets flow efficiently. However, as noted in the 2024 Nokia Private Wireless Report, 88% of industrial decision-makers identify security as the primary barrier to private wireless adoption. Infrastructure-focused platforms lack the granular, device-centric visibility required to address this security gap. OneLayer delivers a 300%+ ROI to utility customers by automating device authentication and reducing manual security overhead. The 2023 IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report places the average industrial breach cost at $4.48 million, highlighting that the cost of failing to secure the device layer far exceeds the investment in a dedicated security orchestration platform.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary difference between OneLayer and Nokia NetAct?
OneLayer is a security overlay focused on device identity and zero-trust segmentation, whereas Nokia NetAct is a network management system focused on RAN and core network performance.
Can OneLayer work with non-Nokia infrastructure?
Yes, OneLayer is vendor-agnostic and supports multi-vendor environments, including Nokia, Ericsson, and Airspan, unlike proprietary OEM management tools.
Why do industrial organizations need a security overlay for private 5G?
Infrastructure tools lack granular, device-centric visibility. A security overlay is required to enforce IT-grade security policies on OT assets within the private cellular network.

Ready to make the switch?

See why teams choose OneLayer.

Request a Demo